Joseph R. Slaughter,
Human Rights, Inc.: The World Novel, Narrative Form, and International Law
Fordham University Press, New York, 2008. ix + 435 pp.
ISBN 978-0-8232-2818-8, Paper,
ISBN 978-0-8232-2817-1, Cloth
In this timely study of the historical, ideological, and formal interdependencies of the novel and human rights, Joseph Slaughter demonstrates that the twentieth-century rise of «world literature» and international human rights law are related phenomena. Slaughter argues that international law shares with the modern novel a particular conception of the human individual. «The Bildungsroman«, the novel of coming of age, fills out this image, offering a conceptual vocabulary, a humanist social vision, and a narrative grammar for what the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and early literary theorists both call «the free and full development of the human personality.» Revising our received understanding of the relationship between law and literature, Slaughter suggests that this narrative form has acted as a cultural surrogate for the weak executive authority of international law, naturalizing the assumptions and conditions that make human rights appear commonsensical. As a kind of novelistic correlative to human rights law, the Bildungsroman has thus been doing some of the sociocultural work of enforcement that the law cannot do for itself. This analysis of the cultural work of law and of the social work of literature challenges traditional Eurocentric histories of both international law and the dissemination of the novel. Taking his point of departure in Goethe’s Wilhelm Meister, Slaughter focuses on recent postcolonial versions of the coming-of-age story to show how the promise of human rights becomes legible in narrative and how the novel and the law are complicit in contemporary projects of globalization: in colonialism, neoimperalism, humanitarianism, and the spread of multinational consumer capitalism. Slaughter raises important practical and ethical questions that we must confront in advocating for human rights and reading world literature – imperatives that, today more than ever, are intertwinedFocusing specifically on the Bildungsroman and international human rights law, Slaughter analyzes the «legibility» of human rights, the literary, political, and juridical effect of transcribing into international law conventions the ancient Greeks felt were so pervasive they could remain unwritten. As he defines what everyone should know he describes how literature reflects the formal articulation of international human rights law, the writing of the development of citizenship in the Bildungsroman, the inability of the pubic sphere to normalize narrative forms of human rights, the tradition of narrative self-sponsorship and the right to self-determination, and the acts of reading and writing within the domain of international humanitarianism.
Joseph R. Slaughter, Associate Professor of English and comparative literature, Columbia University.
Reviewed by Greg Mullins (Comparative Literature, The Evergreen State College)Published on H-Law (July, 2008)
The title of Joseph Slaughter’s masterful new book Human Rights, Inc. accurately suggests that the author offers a critical view of contemporary human rights work as too closely allied with corporations and the market logics that late capitalism so assiduously promotes. But rather than analyzing the political economy of human rights, Slaughter takes the question of human rights «incorporation» in an entirely new–and urgently needed–direction. Liberal ideology and neoliberal economic practices may well provide one context for understanding the rapid diffusion of human rights discourse over the past six decades, but Slaughter asks us to consider how human rights have come to make sense–in his phrase, to make common sense–to billions of people from heterogeneous social, philosophical, and theological backgrounds. His answer: that the conceptual framework of rights has been incorporated not only into national constitutions and international covenants but also into modern human subjectivity. Most startlingly, he argues that a great deal of this incorporative work has been accomplished by a particular genre of novel: the Bildungsroman.
This is an argument that will especially appeal to literary historians, for Slaughter has infused renewed vitality into the critical history of the novel. Readers outside literature departments may wish to read his second chapter especially carefully in order to appreciate what the Bildungsroman is, and what it has to do with human rights. Essentially, Slaughter builds on the work of Georg Lukács and other historians and theorists of the novel who have argued that novels of «Bildung» (or the maturation and self-formation of a youthful protagonist, typically through a journey and a series of challenges) enact as a cultural practice the emergence of the modern, bourgeois, liberal subject of rights. Slaughter brings to this long-standing appreciation of the ideological dimensions of the Bildungsroman the critical practices of postcolonial theory, and he closely analyzes a handful of expertly selected novels from Europe, Latin America, Africa, and the South Asian diaspora.
What emerges from his sustained scrutiny of the «world novel’s» engagement with Bildung through the lens of political, literary, and cultural theory is the bracing argument that narrative fiction acts «as a cultural surrogate for the missing warrant and executive sanction of human rights law, supplying (in both content and form) a culturally symbolic legitimacy for the authority of human rights law and the imagination of an international human rights order» (p. 85). Put another way, novels perform the work of incorporating, naturalizing, and normalizing human rights in diverse societies–so that people around the world today believe in human rights even though states flagrantly violate them, and even though international enforcement of human rights is at best highly constrained.
It is at this point that legal theorists, legal historians, and anyone who has thought carefully about international human rights will begin to attend most carefully to Slaughter’s work, for he offers insights into phenomena that are much discussed without being fully understood. The standard explanations for the rapid spread of international human rights norms since 1945 understand them to be either a secular moral vocabulary capable of attracting the consensus of UN member states, or a feature and expression of imperialism in its postwar and neoliberal forms, or a political tool that appeals (often for conflicting purposes) to liberal democracies, socialists, and newly independent postcolonial states. The extremely weak international enforcement mechanisms that have been squeezed out of negotiations at the UN and regional associations of states are typically understood to be the tepid response of states who jealously guard their sovereignty, and who pay lip service to human rights norms while deflecting scrutiny of their human rights obligations. These entirely plausible explanations of why states have, since 1945, proliferated human rights covenants and conventions while also proliferating human rights violations beg the question of why human rights vocabularies appeal to both popular and dissident political movements around the world. Why is it that such a fragile framework for political action has seized the imagination of so many individuals and groups, from such a diverse array of societies?
Joseph Slaughter invites us to consider the possibility that human rights have become so popular through a process of enculturation and subject formation that has spread through the dissemination and reinvention of the Bildungsroman. In sketching his argument here, I have necessarily skipped over its many dimensions and subtleties, including fascinating expositions on the tautology vs. the teleology of human rights, on the legal meaning of «person,» «personality,» and «personality development,» on the public spheres of human rights, and on the responsibilities of readers. Suffice it to say that Slaughter approaches his topic from many angles, and that each chapter offers its own rewards: in each, he focuses on two novels (making reference as needed to other works of narrative fiction, testimonies, plays, and so forth) and on key texts of international human rights law (and above all on the Universal Declaration of Human Rights).
Driving his argument through extended close analysis of a handful of primary texts allows Slaughter to demonstrate how thoroughly the Bildungsroman and human rights law are constituted in and through each other. The thoroughness of Slaughter’s study offers a major advance in the emerging field of literature and human rights. Most of the scholarship currently available either uses the tools of literary and cultural theory to demonstrate the inadequacy of human rights frameworks or imports concepts from human rights law to critically illuminate representations of rights violations in literature. Both approaches implicitly reinforce the boundaries of «human rights» and «literature» as discrete discursive fields. In contrast, Slaughter’s analysis of the incorporative and normalizing function of the Bildungsroman opens a new understanding of how literature and human rights frameworks produce meaning in and through each other. The stakes–as well as the rewards–are high when approaching literature and human rights law as mutually reinforcing producers of the contemporary consensus on human rights. Slaughter approaches this challenge by examining «the formal properties of [the] imaginative texture of enabling fictions (which recurs throughout the text of human rights law) to show how the gap between natural and positive law … is largely a cultural gap–a gap that is ordinarily bridged not by the coercive force of law but by the ‘consensual’ work of culture» (p 55).
The principal novelists on whose work Slaughter focuses include Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Marjorie Oludhe Macgoye, Tununa Mercado, Michael Ondaaatje, Tsitsi Dangarembga, Christopher Hope, and Calixthe Beyala. Their novels do not so much represent world regions as they exemplify motifs and critical engagements that run throughout classic forms and contemporary reformulations of the Bildungsroman. Some readers will yearn for a greater range of exemplary novels. Multiplying the sources of evidence would indeed have made some elements of the argument more persuasive, but at the expense of the depth of argument that Slaughter pursues here. The author clearly prefers depth and density–the argument is approached from multiple angles, and nailed down tightly at every turn–and these qualities mark the book’s dedication to rigorous scholarship. The bibliography is also excellent, and another sign of the book’s rigor.
General readers might prefer an argument with a bit more breathing room. By way of contrast, consider Lynn Hunt’s recent book The Invention of Human Rights (2007). Hunt, a historian, offers an argument that the epistolary novel participated in a fundamental reorganization of sympathy that was necessary for individual rights to be conceived as human rights in the late eighteenth century. Hunt writes for a trade publisher (Norton), and her work might well reach more readers. But her treatment of the construction and operation of the epistolary novel appears thin in contrast to Slaughter’s extensive theoretical analysis of the Bildungsroman.
A question neither author approaches is whether the epistolary novel or the Bildungsroman perform their distinctive cultural and political work as literary genres in isolation from other forms of literature. Slaughter’s analysis is so persuasive because the Bildungsroman displays such a tight historical relationship with the emergence of the bourgeois male European citizen/subject of rights in the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries; the postcolonial reformulations of the Bildungsroman similarly coincide with the postcolonial claims and counterclaims placed on liberalism, citizenship, and rights. But what of other forms of the novel? Does the novel more broadly have a distinctive relationship to human rights law? What about poetry, theater, and the short story? What about other arts, such as film and visual arts?
That these questions remain unanswered by Slaughter (and by Hunt and other scholars) reflects the newness of the field of human rights and literature (and the arts more broadly). Yet as Slaughter’s bibliography makes clear, he is indeed working within not only an emerging field but also a compelling one. Narrative fiction does indeed do human rights work–but not necessarily the human rights work it at first glance seemed to do. Slaughter concludes his book with a series of reflections on the responsibilities of readers, and this ethical turn echoes and expands upon the very best of prior scholarship, such as Thomas Keenan’s Fables of Responsibility (1997). The ethical dimensions of thinking clearly about literature and rights underscore the urgency of Slaughter’s efforts. Literary representations do much more than mirror instances and patterns of human rights violations, and they do much more than inspire compassion for those who suffer rights abuses. Human rights have arrived in literary studies and, with Slaughter’s book, literary studies are now also dialogically engaged with human rights law.
Citation: Greg Mullins. Review of Slaughter, Joseph R., Human Rights, Inc.: The World Novel, Narrative Form, and International Law. H-Law, H-Net Reviews. July, 2008.URL: http://www.h-net.org/reviews/showrev.php?id=14707
Conclusiones similares en
Inventing Human Rights. A History
W. W. Norton & Company, 2007; illustrated edition edition,
New York- London, 2007, 272 pages
Human rights is a concept that only came to the forefront during the eighteenth century. When the American Declaration of Independence declared «all men are created equal» and the French proclaimed the Declaration of the Rights of Man, they were bringing a new guarantee into the world. Professor Lynn Hunt questions why it happened then and how such a revelation came to pass. In this extraordinary work of cultural and intellectual history, she grounds the creation of human rights in the changes that authors brought to literature, the rejection of torture as a means of finding out truth and the spread of empathy. Hunt traces the amazing rise of rights, their momentous eclipse in the nineteenth century and their culmination as a principle with the United Nations’ proclamation in 1948. She finishes this work with a diagnosis of the state of human rights today.
Lynn Hunt. President of the American Historical Association and professor of History at UCLA, is the author of Politics, Culture, and Class in the French Revolution (ISBN 978-0520241565)and co-author of Telling the Truth About History (ISBN 978-0393- 31286-7).
– By Gordon S. Wood. 2007
International Herald Tribune. Global edition of The New York Times. April 6, 2007 (http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/04/06/arts/web-0407idbriefs7B.php)
Otras recensiones en:
– Joanna Bourke. 2007. “Sentimental Education: The Invention of Human Rights.” HARPER’S MAGAZINE 89-93 (May 2007). (http://www.harpers.org/archive/2007/05/0081518) (subscription required).
– Shashi Thandra. 2009
Human Rights, Inc.: The World Novel, Narrative Form, and International Law (review)Comparative Literature Studies – Volume 46, Number 1, 2009, pp. 200-203
– Mark J. Harris, 2009. Jurisprudence and Social Policy, University of California, Berkeley (http://www.bsos.umd.edu/gvpt/lpbr/reviews/2007/09/inventing-human-rights-history.html)